Wednesday, 29 February 2012

rajis essay thing themes


RASCISM / RASCIAL INTOLERANCE / RASCIAL INEQUALITY:

In to kill a mockingbird, these themes are presented within.

There is social inequality shown strongly within the film at the top of the towns social hierarchy would be Atticuss’ family (the finches) and people who live a similar reasonably well of life style. Behind them follow families such as the Cunningham’s which are farmers and not as educated as the finch family. Then behind them almost at the lowest, follow the Ewell family who are ignorant and the poorest of the town also not very well educated. People can look down on them as being the lowest of the towns social hierarchy however beneath them at the lowest are the black people of the town which consequently means that the Ewell’s can believe that persecuting Tom Robinson would make up for there un-importance. This is an extremely discriminating and prejudice action.

We acknowledge the differentiation of structure between races inside the courtroom. Every white member of the courtroom would be seated at the bottom; in isolation from them every black member of the courtroom would be located upstairs. This alone is recognition to the segregation of races at the time period that the film was set. In the 30’s racism was still very much an issue, it was highly frowned upon for white and black people to integrate and therefore it was almost unheard of for a relationship between the two to form.
Also inside the courtroom took place the rape case of which by black male Tom Robinson was the accused subject of raping Myella Ewell (young white girl). The theme is shown strongly through this part of the film, as the accusation was not true. 
Because of breaking the ‘rules’ of society it was easier for the Yule family to set Tom Robinson up as the bad person as they knew that they would win the case as white individuals rather than face becoming judged, frowned upon and unacceptable in society as a result of people knowing that she tried to integrate sexually with a black man. Through this sheer ‘guilt’ Tom Robinson was humiliated judged and accused unjustified.
Bob Yule represents the theme of racial intolerance; the way in which he speaks to Attikas about Tom Robinson was extremely discriminating and offensive to his race. He used words such as “nigger” to get his anger across although he knew himself that Tom was not guilty for the crime he was charged of. This portrays the themes as it shows us that he is intolerant to care what effects his words and actions will have on Tom’s life and this is solely because of the colour of his skin.
Atticuses children also become the victim of racial intolerance word of mouth goes around and the children are called names for their dads work “nigger lover” is some of the names which just portrays the effect of racism on the whole environment. And it is shocking that even children would come out with awful words such as them.
Out side the jail where Tom Robinson is the large group of farmers gather together intending to harm Tom. Although we do not see them actually harm him or infact say it we know what there intensions are and what the reason for this is based on, race. It is not until young Scouse intervenes and deters the group off, one farmer in particular Mr Cunningham, by making him realise that what he is doing is wrong and he guiltily influences the farmers to leave.





JUSTICE AND THE LAW:

Justice and law are important themes in the film although they do not always work together like they should. Atticus is in favour of having justice served which is why he supports Tom Robinson in the courtroom. The theme of law in the film is represented in a manipulative way. The Ewell family choose to manipulate the law based on the fear of no longer being accepted in society or as Atticus says “guilt”.
The jury of the courtroom portray the miss justice of the case as it is made up of all white individuals, the majority being men. This in itself cannot be a fair trail and is questionable whether justice can be served as this all white jury group have already been influenced extremely, by societies racial intolerance and the way society has segregated black from white with black being the lower class. They discuss their decision, which they are not permitted to do. This can change the opinions of some and therefore remains an unfair trail of which justice cannot be served.
“Ideally justice should be blind to race, colour, gender, age or otherwise” Atticus believes the statement and tries to follow it however this is not always abided by within the film and it just shows exactly why justice is not achievable in this particular type of case of the time it is set.


PERSPECTIVE:

To kill a mockingbird shows a Childs prospective on adult events.
Throughout the film Atticus induces his children to try to see the world from other peoples eyes, aswell as there own. Atticus said “you will never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view…until you climb into his skin and walk around in it” the children learn a great deal from this advice.
As Scouse grows to have the ability to put herself in other people’s shoes, it boosts her social understanding of people and the world.
The film as a whole is narrated by Scouse. Showing her prospective of what happened at that stage of her life and all the lessons she had learnt, encouraged by Atticus, to help her build up moral education/perspective. It took her on a journey from innocent Childs ignorance to grown up principled understanding.
Boo Ridley played an important role for the theme of perspective in the film. From the beginning his character was no more than a childish fallacy. However he became more prominently significant as a person to the children as the film went on. He left a number of presents for the children on different days in the tree and also fixed Jems trousers. By the end of the film Scouse can sympathise towards Boo and is finally able to put herself in his shoes. He is infact a symbol of a mocking bird and this fact becomes apparent to her. His kind attributes allow her to see the good there is in people and it is another major lesson leant: not to judge or harm people who keep themselves to themselves and do not harm others. Exactly like the mockingbird notion that Atticus teaches.

MORAL COURAGE/BRAVERY:

Atticus is a substantial representation of moral courage/bravery in the film. His ability to stick to what he knows is morally the right thing to do and defend a black male especially one accused of rape. He knows he will be confronted with threats and judgment however this does not deter him and we relate to him being very morally courageous. Atticus can also be perceived as a brave character as he takes on the mob of farmers who visit the jail alone without panic he confronts them calmly.

ETHICS:

Atticus is the moral teacher guiding the children to establish right from wrong. He knows himself what is right and what is wrong and does not let societies influence determine his decision between the two.
Bob Ewell has no ethics and he shows this by lying after making and oath, prosecuting an innocent man because of his lower class and vulnerability just so that he can be looked at as more of a man rather than a coward. He cannot establish right from wrong at all.
Atticus believes that one-day goodness will prevail over the evils of racism and racial equality will exist.

Monday, 28 November 2011

creep


Creep

Synopsis:
Two men are working in the sewers one man dies the other is assumed to have been attacked. We are introduced to a woman who is exited to be going to a party were she will be meeting George Clooney however unfortunately her friends leave without her and she is left to get a cab to the train station. She falls asleep and misses the last train, she realises she has been locked in in her attempt to get out of the station she experiences many disturbing and horrific murder events and all caused by an individual who we later on realise is Craig who was a test baby for a scientist. It ends with her in the morning sitting in the train station in a state that people think she is a homeless.

Horror genre:
Has the setting of an underground (dark, excluded from the out side) also the creep the bad character that murders, very much a bloody film and also the survivor.

Horrific?
The events that occur in this film are very horrific. The facts of knowing that you have been locked into a place were you are all-alone and not being free until the morning is scary as it is. The is the part where the man attempts to rape her is very horrific the knowledge of knowing that there is no one around to help her. The murders each in themselves are extremely horrific seeing every murder in one night is extremely disturbing and then also the character of the creep s a horrifically displayed character in the film. In the end where Kate is sitting in the train station is awful as everyone entering the station think she is a homeless person.
Key scenes:
The sewer scene.
Kate falling asleep.
The first time of seeing the creep scene.
The scene where we establish that the “creep” is actually an experiment made by the scientist and his name is Craig.
The final scene of her sitting on the platform of the station.

Thursday, 24 November 2011

The horror of Dracula


The horror of Dracula

Synopsis:
 Jonathan harker travels to count Dracula’s castle and playing the part of a librarian for the castle. In an attack caused by Draculas’ bride Dracula unfortunately kills him. Van helsing comes to look for harker discovering that he has died and therefore goes on a quest to find count Dracula and kill him. Along the way van helsing manages to become the hero and save the women of the film and eventually slay Dracula.

Horror film genre:
There are gothical horror elements such as the eagle at the beginning. There is blood and gore in the film villan  (Dracula) protagonist (van helsing) the setting of a deserted castle and also the system of women breaking the rules of horror must be punished.

Contextualising:
 In 1958 women had a lack of free expression and the atmosphere was of a sexist environment this is defiantly portrayed in the film as we see many example of women being shown as inferior to men. Women were seen more as objects than equal beings.

When this film was first released it was an x rated film it is now rated a 12A.


28 days later


28 DAYS LATER

Synopsis:
Britain has previously been infected with an extremely dangerous virus. Character (Jim) wakes up to a deserted country and wreckage everywhere. He is not up to date with what’s has happened but is a survivor. He is found by two fellow survivors a series of events take place where he loses friends but also gains some on the way he left only Jim, Selena and Hannah they eventually reach there destination of which they were expecting to be safe and have the army rescue them however it did not turn out this way and after more bad events they are left to escape which results in better things as they are found by a helicopter and saved.

Conventions of horror genre to fit the film:
The survivors in the film were Jim, Serena and Hannah. Iconographic features e.g. blood, deserted location (Britain after infections spread). Also the hero in the film or antagonist is Jim.

Horrific:
The horrific features of the film could be the blood gore and destruction shown throughout. The way in which people are killed. Wakening up to what feels like a world all alone no one left. The issue of the infection that is extremely contagious. The devastation on seeing someone you have been drawn to come close to die in front of you.

What makes this distinctively a British film?
The location the films set in London signifying that its British.
 The accents of the characters are all British actors. 

Van helsing

Van Helsing

Van Helsing is first introduced to us in hid desire to find his friend Harker who is in quest to find count Dracula and kill him. He comes across as an intelligent man by his mannerisms and the fact that he is a doctor. He asks for information and receives the diary of harker therefore he realises that he is dead and now can further knowledge himself about the whereabouts of Dracula.

As a man we automatically relies that he is a strong character in the film. The holmewood family confide in him as a second opinion doctor for Lucy Holmwood. Van Helsing can see the signs of vampire bites and knows automatically the problem for Lucy’s sickness this tells us that he is an alert character and his intelligence over the first doctor becomes apparent. In the film van helsing is very much the heroic character. The women in the film become independent upon van helsing he is shown as the character who is there to save the day and save the damsel in distresses.  He is shown to be a strong character role as he deals with all the trouble that appears and survives until the end with no bites. 

Monday, 14 November 2011

the horror of Dracula essay


Charlotte singleton.   Film essay



How are women represented as inferior and sexualised beings in ‘The horror of Dracula’? 


The horror of Dracula is a Terrance Fisher, hammer horror film that is very much a gothical horror. It was released 16th June 1958 however the film was set in may 1885 at this time period women were on a different sphere to men. The issue of women being inferior and a lower gender to men was very much an issue at this time of which the film was made. Women where seen to stay at home and do the household chore’s and to have and look after the children.

At the beginning of the film we see a women who lives in Draculas castle she is specifically pinpointed to the statement of ‘women being inferior and sexualised in the film’. We see her asking /begging for help from Harker. Fisher has used this showing women having to rely on men for help and support which makes the male feel they have a higher status in life as they see women to be reliant upon them rather than independent. Also a woman in need of help fits the category of damsel in distress. Continuing to focus on how the statement could fit the first woman in the film we see her low cut dress would have been quite inappropriate and is drawing attention to her assets which places her as a sexualised being. She has to flaunt herself to be noticed by men, which makes her venerable as well as sexualised. The red lipstick together with the low cut dress Fisher has made her to be quite a seductive character in the film. The male gaze becomes apparent in this part if the film.

The next victim in the film is Lucy Holmwood who is sick. Dracula targets her. She is represented in a sexualised way as she becomes addicted to Dracula coming to bite her. The fact that she almost has pleasure from it represents her to be inferior by ‘laying herself on a plate’ for Dracula also when we first see her she is represented as an innocent

Young girl with her high cut night gown and her religious cross around her neck however she takes it off and pulls her
Collar down to show her neck. This contrasts our first perception of her and we now think she fits the statement.

On Van Helsing’s way to the castle of Dracula he stops off at the same place of which Harker stopped at the beginning and asks if they know anything about the whereabouts of his friend Harker. We see inferiority of men to women in this scene as the woman openly begins to tell him about what she knows however the owner puts a stop to her freely speaking to him and she then goes quite after the word of the man.  Although she still gives Van Helsing the diary she found the fact that she had to do it secretly shows she could also be classed as an inferior woman in this film.

The maid of the Holmewood house is a woman who has been used to portray the difference between the rich and the poor according to gender. The fact that mina holmewood is a well of women is because she has a husband to be that way however the maid is a single woman and is having to rely on her money wage from Mr Holemwood to keep her going in life. If she were a richer woman she wouldn’t be working as a maid to serve the family. Maybe this is Fishers point of women being inferior to men and only if they were married to a man would they lead a richer life. However I disagree that the maid is shown as a sexualised being in the film. The maid was also shown to be a ‘damsel in distress’ and needed the help from the two men in the house. As she was almost hysterical, Van Helsing slapped her round the face which she took showing the authority of men vs. women although he did not mean it in offence in the modern day that would not be acceptable.

The next victim for Dracula was Mina holmewood. Mina is represented as a richer well-dressed presentable woman in
society she fits the stereotypical wife in the era the film was set in. wearing high collared tops, hair up, minimal makeup etc. however as like Lucy, when Dracula has put his power on her she also wears her hair down lower cut tops and red lipstick and becomes more of a sexualised being in the film. Although she is portrayed to be quite a strong woman at the beginning when meeting her, she also has to rely on the help of the men to release her from the power of Dracula.

In conclusion it is notable that all the victims that are targeted by Dracula are women excluding Harker. The men became the heroes as they saved the day, which just goes to show that the statement could certainly apply to this film only the men could have been heroic.